Dr. Ian Whillans

A climatologist, an important one, with both a subglacial lake in Antarctica and an ice stream in the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, (formerly known as Ice Stream B), named for him.

No article on Wikipedia.

The warming hole

The warming hole is an area of the United States that has not warmed.

[1] In the last 25 years of the 20th century most major land regions experienced a summer warming trend, but the central U.S. cooled by 0.2–0.8 K. In contrast most climate projections using GCMs show warming for all continental interiors including North America. source

The observed lack of twentieth-century warming in the central United States (CUS), denoted here as the “warming hole,” was examined in 55 simulations driven by external historical forcings and in 19 preindustrial control (unforced) simulations from 18 coupled general circulation models (CGCMs).
In the central US

Google scholar
Is a Decline of AMOC Causing the Warming Hole
Mechanisms Contributing to the Warming Hole
AMS paper
Paper one
Paper two
Paper three
Paper four
Possible source of clouds causing cooling
Scientific paper
Climate Central wrong as usual

Not found on Wikipedia

How science really works

Inspired by a web site on science

Science is an ongoing endeavor. It did not end with the most recent edition of your college physics textbook and will not end even once we know the answers to big questions, such as how our 20,000 genes interact to build a human being or what dark matter is. So long as there are unexplored and unexplained parts of the natural world, science will continue to investigate them.

Most typically in science, answering one question inspires deeper and more detailed questions for further research. Similarly, coming up with a fruitful idea to explain a previouslyanomalous observation frequently leads to new expectations and areas of research. So, in a sense, the more we know, the more we know what we don't yet know. As our knowledge expands, so too does our awareness of what we don't yet understand. For example, James Watson and Francis Crick's proposal that DNA takes the form of a double helix helped answer a burning question in biology about the chemical structure of DNA. And while it helped answer one question, it also generated new expectations (e.g., that DNA is copied via base pairing), raised many new questions (e.g., how does DNA store information?), and contributed to whole new fields of research (e.g., genetic engineering). Like Watson and Crick's work, most scientific research generates new expectations, inspires new questions, and leads to new discoveries.

The Neurophone

While there is a redirect to the inventor, Wikipedia doesn't have an article for it, doesn't actually tell you what it is, what it does, or even what it looks like.  Much less does it really work or not?

Something I would like to know!

Google Scholar

Google

Shift + spacebar (computer keyboard shortcut)

Shift + spacebar reverses the spacebar function. On Windows OS

I was sure this would be found on Wikipedia

I was wrong.

Hansen et al 1981

link

Full paper (pdf, but no OCR)

Theory of the Greenhouse Effect, or the Enhanced greenhouse effect

the Theory of the Greenhouse Effect

Not found on Wikipedia

Google Scholar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_greenhouse_effect
The page "Enhanced greenhouse effect" does not exist.

Not even a redirect.

Google scholar shows over 6000 papers that use the term.