Wolfgang Gleißberg

 No article on Wikipedia, but he should have one.  Of course.

Image of sunspot data

 This used to be in the article on the Altithermal, or Holocene climactic Optimum

It was removed by William Connolly, who is notable for removing not only a lot of information, but banning users who argued against his rampant censorship of information.

He lost his high status there for doing that. But of course he is still deleting information almost every day.  One of the many self proclaimed experts who wants to control what you can read on Wikipedia.  

He was banned from editing Climate Topics, 15 years ago.  While the entire story can't be found on Wikipedia, some of it managed to get through on the article about him.  A lot of it was removed during a very long edit war, which is ironic, since he was the source of so many edit wars.

The same paper noted a 2009 Wikipedia arbitration in which it was concluded that Connolley had used administrator privileges to his own advantage in content disputes,^{[28][circular reference]} and these privileges were removed.^[27] Other academic papers have discussed Connolley's editing activities on Wikipedia and the dispute resolution process as it has been applied to him.^[29]

And of course he is back to deleting information on climate topics again.  

Lots and lots of source material (that used to be on Wikipedia)

 For example https://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/070.htm

You can find it on the wayback machine archive.org

https://web.archive.org/web/20020312152914/http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/070.htm

Update on "bottom friction", which is now found and not found at the same time

 Not found and found at the same time!

Until I created the article I did not know about this one.  When an article is turned into a draft it can't easily be found, it does not show up, even when it is on Wikipedia.   Turning it into a draft is done with a script, the privileged Wikipedians have all kinds of scripts, bots and other means to remove content.

"On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground"

 On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground

It can be found on Wikisource

Or here

Austral winter (edited one hour later) not found on Wikipedia

 Edited the article for austral winter just now.  To see how long it takes to be deleted.

It took exactly one hour lol

Here is the article, and here it is gone.  It redirects to "winter", and of course that article does not contain "austral winter".  Not even one time

It's no surprise the person who did it constantly deletes information from Wikipedia

After all these years, it's an obvious pattern.  I'm not sure any normal person ever contributes to Wikipedia anymore

Karen Read, the woman accused of murdering her Boston police officer boyfriend

If you search you only get this Karen Read, not the one you are hearing about and seeing on TV

Knowing wikipedians,  who always decide who is notable, there will never be an article about the famous Karen Read

Only an article called Killing of John O'Keefe

This is exactly like the case of Bernhard Goetz, who is and was incrdibly well know, but will never be allowed to have an article.

These are the same people that  will create an extensive article on a fictional person, but fight tooth and nail to prevent an article on a real person.  

Don't ask me why, there is no way to know.  I only know the people behind this idiocy are not right in the head.  Recall if you will, this idiot who spends all day, every day, deleting and blanking pages on Wikipedia.  But never creates anything.

This sort of person is why so many people. places and things are not found on Wikipedia.  Remember the Super Galaxy, which is a real thing, but no longer found on Wikipeida.  Or Boreal Winter

And yes, these people think they are smarter than you, and better than you.